Thursday, December 4, 2025
2011 Horror Part Twelve
Tuesday, April 2, 2024
2011 Horror Part Eleven
Monday, April 1, 2024
2011 Horror Part Ten
Friday, March 1, 2024
The Tomie Series Part Three
Thursday, May 4, 2023
2011 Horror Part Nine
Friday, April 30, 2021
2011 Horror Part Eight
Overall: GOOD
Wednesday, March 10, 2021
2010's Robert Morgan Shorts
Thursday, January 28, 2021
2011 Horror Part Seven
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
2011 - 2019 Horror Shorts
(2011)
Dir - Ruairí Robinson
Overall: MEH
This Twilight Zone-esque short from Irish-born filmmaker Ruairí Robinson is the kind that toys with only mildly futuristic ideas that could conceivably be upon us in a more timely fashion than we would be comfortable with. So in other words, it could also be a Black Mirror episode. Blinky™ sets up its premise quickly and it is almost immediately foreseeable where it will lead. So, you cannot say that there is any real tension built up over its brisk, thirteen-minute running time. It is also a bit annoying to watch a brat kid, (who granted has two parents who seem to make yelling at each other around him a thing they routinely do), treat the adorable title robot like his own punching bag slave, but this may be the point as it almost makes the inevitable finale sit comfortably, (or uncomfortably), in the dark comedy realm. A bit too obvious maybe, but still harmlessly well made.
THE ONLY MAN
(2013)
Dir - Jos Man
Overall: GOOD
With filmmakers young and old still scraping the barrel as far as zombie apocalypse ideas are concerned, it is a rare thing when a successfully engaging entry in the field can emerge this day and age. Jos Man's The Only Man is one of these acceptable ideas that portrays the final few days of the title human's predetermined transformation into the undead. What exactly has transpired to make Earth the desolate wasteland that it is and what exactly has stripped everyone of their humanity to the point that they look like extras in a George Romero movie with cheap rubber masks on, (the film's only minor fault), is not explained, but we are given some potent clues. The antagonist pits his will against the zombie plague that is clearly overtaking him, desperately proclaiming that he is going to be the one to make it since the rest of mankind willingly did this to themselves, seeing the lack of formidable thought and reason as more of a release than a damnation. Interesting concepts to ponder and ones that come across excellently here.
VALIBATION
(2013)
Dir - Todd Strauss-Schulson
Overall: GOOD
Teetering on that line of being so on the nose as to be annoying, Valibation is just clever and funny enough to get on board with despite its tongue in cheek, quasi-preachiness. Written and directed by Todd Strauss-Schulson, (The Final Girls), with an impressive amount of visual showmanship and the budget to feature Cocoa Puffs, a Billy Idol dancing montage, and footage from both David Cronenberg's The Fly and Singin' in the Rain, it beats you over the head almost immediately with the same complaint that the cell phone addicted, information age generation gets routinely reminded of. Strauss-Schulson has a lot of fun with this cliche though. It makes for an ideal body horror send up that surprisingly has an uplifting, (be it still warped), final outcome and it is futile to try and not laugh at several of the ridiculous set pieces along the way.
THIS HOUSE HAS PEOPLE IN IT
(2016)
Dir - Alan Resnick
Overall: MEH
The guys from Unedited Footage of a Bear fame back at it again and comparatively less on drugs this time. This House Has People in It follows that staunch tradition for the network of being something that people void of such drugs in their system "don't get". An entire subreddit was dedicated to cracking the code of this whatever the fuck it is which includes deciphering YouTube comments and visiting various websites. So yes, plenty of work for people with time on their hands. Foolishly watching it raw and simply walking away from it, there is really not much to say. Since it was designed to be investigated, the almost twelve minutes of footage by itself is just a puzzling mishmash of tones, with every potential clue whizzing right over your head if you are not constantly pausing every frame to take notes. Even then, it is still hard to contemplate how anybody out there is coming up with anything. It gets points for being a unique, post-interactive media experience at least, but still, you gotta have drugs.
Sunday, January 5, 2020
2011 Horror Part Six
Dir - Juliana Rojas/Marco Dutra
Overall: MEH
This uneven, highly tranquil feature-length debut from Brazilian filmmakers Juliana Rojas and Marcon Dutra, (arriving after over a decade of the duo producing a number of shorts), barely qualifies as a horror movie or anything remotely entertaining at all. At first, the tone is so lackadaisical as to be refreshing with all of the characters dialed down just a notch or so above zero, barely any music anywhere, and the story itself spending about an hour on what would otherwise have been just an initial set up. It is unmistakably about the class system and economic hardships faced in contemporary Brazil, but just how its infrequent, strange and/or supernatural elements play a role is barely touched upon, let alone explained. If there are even such elements present in the first place. This is precisely because the film never seems to get going and it rather abruptly ends just as it begins to finally wake it's audience up. The last scene is also remarkably out of place and seems to paint the whole thing as a comedy, making it more of a practical joke than giving it a frustrating, ambiguous climax which would have even been far preferable.
THE THING
Dir - Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.
Overall: MEH
The word "pointless" is assuredly the most accurate to describe the inevitable remake, reboot, prequel, premake, preboot, repre, quelmake, makeboot, or whatever the fuck 2011's The Thing is. The creative team involved have gone on record as desperately trying to defend its existence in the first place, saying it pays homage to John Carpenter's seminal 1982 version and calling it a companion piece that retreads the same themes of paranoia and isolation. Which is all a very polite and respectable way of saying they really like John Carpenter's movie and wanted to make it themselves because having one movie that already did all this stuff is not enough apparently. This argument can be made for every film that is not left to be its own thing, (pun intended), in the past, but this The Thing is so deliberately derivative of the last one that it not only cannot hope to possibly compare to such a lauded and beloved movie, but it also cannot NOT be compared to it. In this regard, it cannot be viewed on its own terms by its very design. It does not attempt to one-up its predecessor thankfully, but just exists parallel to it with less memorable characters, less memorable special effects, less memorable directing, less memorable music, Mary Elizabeth Winstead in place of Kurt Russell, and interchangeable everything else.
THE SKIN I LIVE IN
Dir - Pedro Almodóvar
Overall: GOOD
Described by Pedro Almodóvar as "a horror story without any screams or frights", The Skin I Live In is a cross between the often influential Eyes Without A Face and well, pretty much every other Pedro Almodóvar movie. The renowned filmmaker's fascination with sexual kinks, the female body, and how complex his emotionally-driven characters are finds an ideal environment to thrive here under the umbrella of Thierry Jonquet's novel Mygale from which this is an adaptation. It is also the first pairing between Almodóvar and Antonio Banderas in just over two decades and the actor predictably excels in the very non-textbook, mad doctor role here. Speaking of pleasant predictability, the film is as wonderfully photographed and meticulously designed as any of Almodóvar's works and the way that the plot deliberately reveals its intentions is something that could have fallen into utter nonsense in the hands of a lesser director. The audience is taken to uncomfortable places so gradually and in such a controlled fashion that the way Almodóvar succeeds in making something so bizarre and downright horrifying also so engaging is one of the reason's his films are routinely talked about and admired in the first place.
Thursday, September 27, 2018
2011 Horror Part Five
Dir - Guy Maddin
Overall: GOOD
Once again Guy Maddin delivers another contemporary movie that seems floating around in a bygone, fictitious era. Keyhole does not fit comfortably into any particular genre and any gangster, film noir, or haunted house elements present are as hazy as the story itself which seems to be re-imagining Homer's The Odyssey in the most indirect of ways. The film has a claustrophobic agenda as it all takes place in a single house and characters appear trapped there either in locked rooms, by chains, or by circumstances. Repeated viewings would probably unveil some missed details, but then again perhaps not. Keyhole presents itself as an abstract look into something that can only be abstract; how ghosts unlock their sorrowful memories and regrets. In this regard, Maddin has concocted a near perfect representation of such things since the challenging narrative can really only be as such. The entire cast is appropriately low-key with the perpetually funny Kevin McDonald specifically providing some intended humor. Horny specters and the sort of the nonchalant way the characters interact with either dead or living versions of themselves further shows that Maddin is still trying to have fun while confusing and tantalizing his viewer's brains all the same.
DETENTION
Dir - Joseph Kahn
Overall: MEH
Prolific music video director Joseph Kahn mostly self-financed Detention, a film which does everything in its power to be both as obnoxiously hip and genre-defying as humanly conceivable. Credit where it is due though; the movie is wildly unpredictable. The humor works when the rug is relentlessly pulled out from under you as the story goes to so many ridiculous places at such a frenzied pace that you give up keeping up. Unfortunately, all that leaves you with is trying to stomach the non-stop bombardment of retro pop culture references. They never cease and they never become tolerable. As much as Kahn is cleverly twisting expectations by bouncing the film though self-aware slasher, sci-fi, and high school comedy avenues ad nauseum, the film's undoing is by how desperately hip it is perpetually attempting to be. The phrase "trying way too hard" is virtually screaming at you the entire time and it gets in the way of all of the surprisingly decent character construction and the inventive, morphed structure. Still, Detention's redeemable qualities almost make it recommendable and different audience types may find its flaws more bearable than others. So if you are up for nothing going according to plan and dance scenes set to "MMMBop" and "Everybody Dance Now", by all means check it out.
THE WOMAN
Dir - Lucky McKee
Overall: WOOF
A highly uncomfortable premise and arguably even more uncomfortable presentation, The Woman is unabashed torture porn and ergo difficult to find any merit in. Lucky McKee also has the odd yet interesting May under his writer/director belt, (and even re-cast Angela Bettis here), and he is collaborating with Jack Ketchum on his novel of the same name. The film is also a sequel to Offspring in that it utilizes the same title woman Pollyanna Mclntosh in the lead. Watching the movie with or without seeing the proceeding one makes no significant difference as the follow-up focuses on a new crop of characters; an agonizingly dysfunctional family and one of the most despicable father-son relationships you are likely to ever see in a movie. With nothing thought-provoking getting through, The Woman becomes a very rough waiting game for these horrible, horrible people to finally get killed and in the mean time we are just watching them be horrible. When this finally happens, the experience was exhausting enough that any comeuppance delivered is too little, too late and the empty, dirty feeling you have left sitting in your brain is not likely to shake off any time soon. It is the most common problem with the sub-genre, namely "what is the point to making or watching a movie like this in the first place?". It is indeed difficult to come up with any answers.
Thursday, July 5, 2018
2011 Horror Part Four
Dir - Nick Murphy
Overall: MEH
Filmmaker Nick Murphy came from a television background and has since returned to it since making his debut films The Awakening and the following year's Blood. The first of these is the type of Gothic, muted-color-pallet-ridden, all too familiar ghost story that gets very few if any unique workouts. Similar yet better films such as The Others were more stylish and inventive, to name but one. The very fact that the plot here has a twist is in and of itself predictable as are most of the scares that come at the nearly always-required spots where the soundtrack gets silent for a few seconds and something quickly pops into frame, ushering in that dreadfully overused "boo scare" cliche that one cannot complain enough about. What works here are the rock solid performances and even a few spooky details that step away from the purely calculated ones. The cinematography otherwise would be impressive if not for the after-mentioned dull, routine, lack of a color scheme that even superhero movies seem required to have now, (looking in your direction Wonder Woman). So if it sounds like the movie adheres to too much contemporary, banal genre pandering, well, that is because it regrettably does.
THE WHISPERER IN DARKNESS
Dir - Sean Branney
Overall: MEH
Though the intent is genuinely heartwarming for the H.P. Lovecraft Historical Society to produce a full-length, independent film adaptation of The Whisperer In the Dark made in the deliberate style of black and white "talkie" films of the early 1930's, the result does not overcome its amateurish shortcomings. Instead of coming off as the labor of love that it is with only the most fanatic Lovecraft fan as its target audience, anyone else coming in will notice significant pacing, production, and acting issues. First off, at a hundred and four minutes long and again made exclusively by the most diehard of Lovecraft enthusiasts, one could logically speculate that the most minimal attempt was made to edit the movie down to a reasonable length as most of the staging is overstuffed. Many scenes simply drag on far too long and continue to repeat the same information. A tighter cut of the film would have kept things flowing much more sensibly. The very poor CGI can be forgivable due to the movie's minimal budget, but this is another case where "less is more" would have been far more effective than seeing the Yuggoth native creatures in a fully lit, visible form. Performance wise, Matt Foyer's exaggerated frowny-face and Daniel Kaemon's attempts at being a hammy villain both come off as silly. The liberties taken with Lovecraft's source material to provide more character depth and story arcs are rather clumsy as well and mixed with the other aforementioned problems, there is unfortunately just too much that does not work here.
FATHER'S DAY
Dir - Adam Brooks/Jeremy Gillespie/Matthew Kennedy/Steven Kostanski/Steven Kostanski/Conor Sweeny
Overall: MEH
Going into a Troma film expecting anything but the most absurd, gross-out shock garbage for garbage's sake would be disingenuous and by that decree, Father's Day is certainly a Troma film. The usual completely inept, technical ingredients such as high school play level acting, a billion cuts, hand held camerawork, extreme closeups, absolutely terrible cinematography, not bothering to record anyone's dialog properly, and throwing in as many plot holes as you can possibly fit into a single screenplay are all present. As far as actual content, the movie equally does not disappoint in its unpleasantness. A homosexual demon rapes and mutilates himself and his victims in unflinching detail, including dicks being ripped off by the mouth, gorged upon, and sliced apart. There is also hardcore incest because why would there not be? As clearly self-aware-obnoxious as Father's Day most confidently is, sitting through it is hardly the most pleasurable experience even for the most genuine movie trash lover. Over the top everything is great and can be often appreciated, but the majority of what is on screen here combined with how intentionally incompetent it is presented just makes it a chore. On that note, the movie is just too damn long. One can easily tune-out long before it literally ventures into hell where there was nothing more to be appalled at. Seeing Lloyd Kaufman as God is a hoot, but do we really need all the man-rape, penis eating, and sister banging?
Sunday, August 20, 2017
2011 Horror Part Three
SLEEP TIGHT
Dir - Jaume Balagueró
Overall: GREAT
Jaume Balagueró's outstanding Sleep Tight is more of a straight up thriller than a horror film and a straight up thriller that gets everything right from beginning to end. Balagueró’s direction and Alberto Marini’s script are both fantastic as we are deliberately misled from the very opening scene, only for things to remain completely unpredictable until the credits roll. When your main objective is to build tension throughout the duration of your movie, this could not have been handled better. Luis Tosar’s César is one of the most sinister villains you are likely to see; a malevolent, behind-the-scenes manipulator whose resourcefulness is as uncomfortably admiring as it is disturbing. Plus, he is our main protagonist for the entire film, making this a challenging yet fascinating framework to utilize. There is some perfectly toned, dark humor sprinkled throughout and numerous moments are as comically intense as they are memorable. In addition, the ending is as pitch perfect as you were hoping not to hope it would be.
Dir - Ti West
Overall: MEH
Ti West's sophomore effort The House of the Devil gained the independent writer/director some positive critical attention, yet some of the problems that are present there are also in his follow-up The Innkeepers. In this respect, West is a frustrating filmmaker. His work is often present with well done, individual moments and the amount of tension he can create can be very rewarding. Working mostly in the horror field, creepy, unsettling, and/or disturbing things find their way in some capacity into each of his offerings in this genre. At the same time though, every one of his scripts suffer from irrational behavior from his characters and very apparent plot holes, all of which deflates what would otherwise work. West's insistence on writing his scripts solo would appear to be the problem then. With no one to bounce ideas off of and point out how some of them do not work, he stumbles to varying degrees. There is some well-produced spookiness here, particularly a scene in a very eerie basement that is impossible not to get chilled by. So it achieves its goal as a haunted house, (hotel), movie in that respect, but achieving its goal as a good movie in any other capacity is simply outside of its grasp.
YOU'RE NEXT
Dir - Adam Wingard
Overall: MEH
Another very problematic, contemporary horror outing that misses the mark with its botched tone and severely flawed script is Adam Wingard's You're Next. Both Windgard's direction and screenwriter Simon Barrett's script are the culprits; neither melding into the competent whole that they are required to. As a cooky, over-the-top, "Home Alone if it was a horror movie", tongue-in-cheek dark comedy, this could have utilized a far sillier emphasis to make its wacky plot work. Instead, the comedy element is not the prominent one, Wingard choosing to play most of the film as a straight slasher outing. This is even more precarious because for a long time now, slasher films are nearly impossible to come off as compelling or unique. So, meshing one already tired sub-genre with another that would have benefited from more overt comedy produces a fumbling exercise for ninety-four minutes. Wingard has a likeable enthusiasm for gore and seems content to stick with the horror genre, so hopefully he is capable of surprising us at some juncture further down the road.
Thursday, September 10, 2015
2011 Horror Part Two
HUSK
Dir - Brett Simmons
Overall: WOOF
The After Dark Film series has offered up some incredibly terrible films such as Gravedancers and Frontier(s) and though not as unwatchable as either of those, Brett Simmons' Husk is easily still in the "terrible" realm. Scarecrows are naturally creepy, comparatively not that overused in horror movies, and ergo one would think that they would be close to idiot-proof to do well. For the first twenty or so minutes here, this is indeed the case. The main problem though is that the film embraces nearly every cliche in the book and has protagonists that consistently, scene after scene, do the most illogical things possible. The laws of physics are also ignored where characters have been hacked to pieces and pierced with sharp things only to be granted spontaneous stamina and "I'm not dead yet" bouts of not being dead. Elsewhere, a car crashes, cell phones do not work, a creepy farm house is surrounded by corn, the phone there also does not work there are ghostly flashbacks, tons of boo scares exactly and always where you expect them to be, lights do not work, cars do not start, and every character is unlikable and a moron. This basically sums up the game here and even if you like to watch horror films where you can eat popcorn and laugh at how stupid it is, this takes itself seriously enough to just make you anxiously await for it to be over instead.
THE TUNNEL
Dir - Carlo Ladesma
Overall: GOOD
A crowdfunded, Australian feature-length debut from Filipino-born director Carlo Ledesma, The Tunnel was done on a very modest, $36,000 budget, which is nearly $100,000 less than they were originally going for. Ladesma and his crew nevertheless make splendid use of their funds while plunging their four actors into the real-life underground tunnels of Sydney. The film only has a few minor problems with it, namely that is is yet another found footage movie presented as a finished documentary. So once again, we at least know that the interviewed characters are all going to end up OK while the ones not interviewed are not. Also, the last few minutes here do not work so well, coming off as a little underwhelming. The actual holy-shit creepy parts though are quite memorable, rather in spire of or because of the fact that they take awhile to get to and are somewhat few and far between. It is flawed by design, but for the forgiving viewer that champions getting genuinely freaked-out above anything else, it more that suffices.
Dir - Filip Tegstedt
Overall: GOOD
The personally funded film debut from Filip Tegstedt is one of those psychological dramas that merely disguises itself as a horror movie. The concept is plenty excellent in that it contemporizing the Mare from Swedish folklore into a story of a father and husband who is crumbling at the seems. The film spends very, very little time on the actual spooky stuff, which perhaps makes said spooky stuff that much more effective when it does emerge. Comparisons can be made with this and Guillermo del Toro's work as both filmmakers do not seem exclusively interested in scaring us for ninety-ish minutes. Instead, they are more concerned with slamming home an individual, relatable narrative. Sweden is not known for producing many horror movies, (death metal yes, horror no, perhaps oddly), but it would be nice to think that films like this can show what truly can be done in the genre. It is certainly deserving of carrying the torch in such a manner so here is hoping more traditional folklore can be delivered in films, both creepy and compellingly like it is here.











































